Shadow of a Diagnosis

When Interpretation Becomes Infrastructure

Monica A. Ross, DSW, LPCC Visiting Scholar, UC Berkeley

Drawing on the humanities and science and technology studies, this project examines how psychiatric interpretations move from clinical encounters into contemporary digital systems, where they shape subsequent self-understanding, institutional understanding, and decision-making. It asks how clinical practice can preserve context and promote agency.

Monica Ross is a psychotherapist, author, and Visiting Scholar with UC Berkeley’s Center for Science, Technology, Medicine & Society and the Office for the History of Science and Technology. Her clinical experience informs the project’s attention to how psychiatric knowledge is interpreted, documented, and carried into subsequent institutional decisions and understandings of the self.

Practice foundation

Grounded in clinical and organizational practice

This research grows from work across community health, integrated care, employee assistance, telehealth, digital mental health, and technology organizations.

Kaiser PermanenteIntegrated healthcare
headspaceDigital mental health & EAP
Texas DFPSPublic human services
ORACLE TALEOEnterprise technology

Community-based clinical care across FQHCs, community clinics, telehealth, and private practice.

Selected employment and contract experience. Organizations are included for biographical context only; no current affiliation or endorsement is implied.

01 / Core ideas

Two movements of interpretation

Two related areas of inquiry examine how interpretations acquire institutional force and how people remain participants in accounts that shape their lives.

How interpretations acquire institutional authority

Diagnostic capture

An area of inquiry into what happens when provisional clinical interpretations enter records and institutional systems.

01

How do interpretations change as they become institutional records?

02

When does repetition begin to look like evidence?

03

What makes a consequential interpretation difficult to revise?

Selected Published Work

Published writing traces how names, records, and classifications can influence later interpretation.

Making Up Patients: Diagnostic Classification, Administrative Kinds, and the Limits of Psychiatric Identity

Philosophical Psychology · Forthcoming

Special issue: Ian Hacking and the Philosophy of Psychiatry

For the Misnamed

The Lancet Psychiatry · 2026

Read

When a Name Replaces the Story

The Polyphony · 2026

Read

Shadow of a Diagnosis

Please See Me · 2025

Read

Research in Progress

Current research examines how psychiatric categories, inherited records, and AI representations enter future practices of recognition and decision-making.

Narrative and Diagnostic Capture

A categorical representation of a person can remain static and durable even as the person changes and acts back upon it. In other words, the stories we tell about ourselves also have an afterlife, shaping what we believe about who we are and what we are capable of becoming.

Once captured in documentation, interpretations can be circulated and repeatedly reactivated. What might this persistence mean for healing, post-traumatic growth, and future possibilities for health?

My research on narrative and diagnostic capture examines how clinical interpretations endure across institutional systems, continuing to shape how a person is understood even as the person, circumstances, or explanations for the original encounter change.

The project is especially concerned with what happens when contestable interpretations are carried forward through documentation and institutional practice. As these interpretations persist, their continued presence can increase the authority they are understood to possess. The question, therefore, is not only why an old story survives, but how systems of preservation can transform persistence into apparent authority, shaping what comes to count as established knowledge about a person.

Reversibility and Longitudinal AI

How AI systems should revise the status and authority of information over time, particularly when earlier representations persist but should no longer govern subsequent inference.

Current research program

Research notes